How Long Does it Take to Prepare for IELTS? Timeline and Tips
November 19, 2024
Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or a shortage of money. Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations. Write over both views and give your own opinion.
Include any pertinent examples from your knowledge or experience along with justifications for your response.
Table of Contents
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
Note:
- Write at least 250 words.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this writing task.
Model Sample Answer 1
Band 9 - Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or a shortage of money. Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Life has the tendency to give one situation they might never have thought possible. A person gets stuck in a job they don’t like at all or financial hardships are their companions. In dealing with these, people often differ on whether such conditions are acceptable or whether one should struggle to get out of such conditions. This essay seeks to argue both sides of the case and present my view on the issue at hand.
Those who prefer accepting a not-so-good situation want to assume that the acceptance of reality brings calm to the mind. According to them, some situations are out of control, and any fight against them is bound to bring more frustration and mental disturbance. An example is low-paying employment. The decision to put up with that can sometimes be because of the reality connected with that time, where the value of stability at all costs and avoiding turmoil, thus possibly caused by change. This acceptance then helps in building resilience in a person to make the most out of what they have in hand, thus eliminating any kind of discontent and anxiety from that situation.
On the other hand, one should never give in since there is always an opportunity to improve on that. The pursuit of better circumstances can lead one to grow personally, enjoy new opportunities, and therefore experience an improved quality of life. For instance, someone who is dissatisfied with a certain career may opt to put forth effort in further education or the development of skills, allowing the doors to more satisfying jobs that pay better to open wider. It reflects the belief that circumstances yield effort and determination, making individuals able to produce better outcomes.
While at times it is acceptable to endure a difficult situation for the sake of maintaining psychological balance in the short term, effort towards change has more positive long-term outcomes. The bottom line is knowing the situation and whether or not it can be controlled. If an opportunity to improve exists, then the action will be more fulfilling since it enhances growth and confidence in one’s self. It offers a balanced way, however, where situations might just be inherently unchangeable.
Model Sample Answer 2
Band 8.5- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or a shortage of money. Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Life is sure to experience many hardships, and individuals vary in how they respond to adverse conditions. Some think that an unfavorable situation, like an unsatisfying job or a shortage of money, should be accepted. Others think that people ought to do something to better the situation. This essay will discuss both sides and my opinion on the issue.
People supporting the acceptance of a bad situation believe that it can give peace and reduce stress. They think that fighting circumstances that are hard to change is frustrating, and accepting them can breed resilience. For example, a person in a job they dislike may remain there because of job security or lack of alternatives. Acceptance allows them to shift their attention to what could be right, like security at home or helpful co-workers. In a scenario where there is no simple change and it involves heavy risk and resources, one has no choice but to accept so as to avoid the unnecessary hassle of a situation.
Others claim that in the face of hardship, something has to be attempted to make things better. This mindset leads to a human’s personal growth and a much more rewarding life. For instance, if an individual hates his or her job, then maybe he or she will think of going back to school to acquire even higher education, learning new talents, or other options for a career for a more rewarding life. Similarly, an individual who faces financial constraints might take part-time work or cut down the expenses to improve his situation in the long run. The urge to change inspires a person to be masterly and triumphant since it influences individuals to exert control over their lives and overcome many troubles of life through proactive measures.
For me, of course, it depends on the situation and the person’s life situation. Although accepting a reality that cannot be changed may have its advantages for preserving mental stability, generally speaking, attempts to make things better are more empowering and rewarding. For example, a temporary bad financial situation may result in greater long-term satisfaction in trying to lower expenses or increase income. However, if the job market is very tough and opportunities are scarce, then acceptance would be a necessity in the short term. Yet, overall, I believe that acceptance gives temporary relief, but more often than not, seeking change leads to greater personal satisfaction and success.
Model Sample Answer 3
Band 7- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or a shortage of money. Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations.
When one comes across a problem such as an unsatisfactory job or a lack of finances, one may either submit to the situation or modify it. It is actually a controversial subject because, to some, the situation should not be changed but accepted, yet to others, the person should change the situation, this essay will discuss both sides and then develop my side of the argument on the subject.
Those who believe in accepting difficult situations stress the importance of emotional well-being and practicality. Acceptance can be an important coping mechanism when circumstances are outside of an individual’s control. For instance, someone working in an unsatisfactory job may feel that the risk of leaving it without a backup plan outweighs the potential benefits, especially if they have dependents. Similarly, in economic instability, one may avoid stress and anxiety by accepting the limitations imposed on the use of finances. Accepting their reality, people can adapt to challenges and maintain their mental health without undue frustration.
Conversely, most agree that a person should take responsibility for improving a poor condition. It brings a lot of freedom, fulfillment, and the opportunity for growth if people seek improvement. Such as if a person feels treated badly in his workplace or has been undervalued, he could begin by educating himself to look for other chances in employment. Similarly, ending a financial dry spell would depend on one’s second job or one’s new found financial genius. Indeed, it puts one away from stagnation to full confidence with an enriched life.
In my opinion, I believe it is the situation that tells whether to accept or strive to change a difficult circumstance. Acceptance is certainly the better choice at certain moments, especially when change in that moment cannot be done- but, generally, striving for improvement whenever this is possible leads to more fulfilling lives. Acceptance goes hand-in-hand with real reflection and preparation for a potential opportunity down the line while trying to better circumstances fosters the spirit of resilience and aspiration. Hence, the right balance between all these approaches may lead to the proper handling of challenges in life.
